Sunday, May 5, 2024

LCTITAN - Quarterly Update

My previous article here

Last week, LCTITAN announced its quarterly result.  We saw 8 consecutive quarters of losses totalling 108 sen.  Over this period, LCTITAN NTA declines from 5.45 down to 5.12, or 33 sen.  

Not quite sure yet why 108 sen of earnings loss only caused 33 sen decline in NTA.  Normally, if a company spends RM100 on capex, the impact to earnings if depreciate over 5 years is RM20 i.e. the other way round.  NAPS is a Balance Sheet item, i.e. impact of spending on Balance Sheet should be larger than impact on Earnings, not the other way round.


Nevertheless, as a result of the published earnings loss, price open with a small gap down, and made an intraday new low last Friday, before closing at the previous support price level of 1.07.  Many short term traders will be looking at the price action the next week or two. 
Typically, I could be looking out for divergence signs.  Negative continued losses news like this should typically be followed by lower prices, where a possible accumulation zone could be RM1.   However, price actions can surprised us.  All else equal, no rush to accumulate when prices are declining.

For perspective, long term charts look like this - it hasn't quite put in a double bottom yet, even if it feels close (feels can last 1-2 years, or months, or weeks, or days):

Other Fundamental Updates

1. This Quarter vs LY same quarter - still loss, but better

2. This Quarter vs Prior Quarter - still loss, but better
3. Future Prospects - still uncertain, company says little
4. Capital Commitments - still at least another RM1.2 billion (and more) to go
5. Long Term Borrowings - the loans for LINE project is in USD Secured term loans and due to weakening Ringgit, the presentation currency showed nearly +20% growth, even if in USD terms, it increased less.
6. Market Cap vs Equity
Buffer from Balance Sheet perspective - substantial
  • Market cap is RM2.5 billion, vs Equity of RM11.7 billion.  Market is fearful, because it is valuing every RM1 of equity as being worth only 21 sen.  
  • Total loan is RM7.2 billion.  Equity is already less loans.  So, even if we doubled the loan, the remaining equity is worth RM4.5 billion, still higher than market cap.   Market is very fearful.
  • Total capital commitment is RM1.2 billion.  So, even if we doubled the loan, reduce the current capital commitment and assume it is worth nil (which Board thinks it is worth nil?), remaining equity is RM3.3 billion, still higher than RM2.5 billion.
Buffer from Earnings perspective - substantial
  • Total 8 quarter losses = 108 sen x 2.312 billion shares outstanding = RM2.5 billion.  Equity coverage is 4.7 times i.e. Surplus = 3.7 times.
  • 3.7 times x 8 quarter (2 years) = 7.4 years.
  • This suggests that if RM1 earnings loss translates to reduce RM1 in net worth (it doesn't), then, this company can continue to withstand another 7.4 years of losses that we've seen over the past 2 years.
  • I doubt LCTITAN will continue to see 30 consecutive losses (or 7.5 years of losses) similar to last 8 quarters.
Question - what is LCTITAN's intrinsic value?
There are usually 2 perspectives here - from future earnings perspective and from a break-up value perspective as a floor.

Most of the time, we use a future earnings perspective because we don't know when a company will break-up - the latter depends on opportunities that we cannot predict in advance.  

From a future earnings perspective, LCTITAN has gotten a bad rep, due to 8 quarters of consecutive losses.  As a business, we need to be profitable, not keep losing monies.  

However, there are 2 glaring gaps for those who thinks LCTITAN is not worth anything given the continued losses.
  1. Why are shareholders and management continuing to invest in LCTITAN?  Why turn every RM1 cash into 21 sen immediately by spending?   Board and Management must have their reasons and it's clearly not nil.  Likely, they see the intrinsic value, beyond the stock market valuation.  (However, there is no reward for coming out to say their stock is clearly under-valued as it becomes a broken record with every continued loss reported).

  2. What if this loss turns out to be temporary?  Then, the stock market reaction becomes manic-depressive, going from utter depression to euphoric mania.
What is the play here?
To me, this is a "turnaround" play, not a dividend play.   

The basic idea is to have a position at the bottom (wherever that is), so that if/when price reverses, we ride the turnaround.

We can't position too early - if too early, the average price is too high.

We can position a bit late, but more than half the time, the rise could be too rapid as this stock is severely under-valued.  Meaning by the time it is recognized as bottom, FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out) sets in and the rise can be rapid (or not).

So, noone knows where is the bottom, and many are looking out, so, this leads the market to look ahead, typically by around 6-12 months.  Meaning, if someone knows the truth and thinks that the turnaround will happen by then, they'll buy now and not wait until it is announced.

So, the only way to know if someone is buying now, is Technical Analysis - the analysis of price and volume.  Even then, it's still 50-50 guesswork.  Last Friday, they were not buying, as price made new low.  Last Friday was definitely not capitulation i.e. not setting up rapid rise yet.
 
Pure Fundamental Analysis -waiting for the next quarterly report to show a turnaround - is typically 9-15 months too late.

Target Position Sizing
As at last Friday, my LCTITAN position size is 2.04% of the market value of my portfolio excluding cash.  Since my last article in Jan 2024 (which my last buy was RM1.11), I had done 4 significant sales between RM1.4x to RM1.5x, and then, waited and then bought back at RM1.1x twice at smaller transaction size than my sales.  My last buy was on 8 March 2024 at RM1.11.  Still waiting to see the bottom to maybe add a bit more.

For a long term, uncertain, turnaround play, 2% of portfolio is about right for prudent investors where neutral is 3% capital owning 33 good quality long term stocks.  For aggressive investors they could aim for 3% capital position or more but not more than 4% relative to the other strategy.   Higher than 4%, you are deviating from your strategy.  I never own anything (except for MAYBANK) to be more than 5% capital and for those of you who has massive risk appetite, if you are contemplating to use leverage, you are a gambler.

Our investment goal is not to be proven right.   Our goal here is to position our investment portfolio so that we can continue to make new all time highs regularly.   If your goal is to let your portfolio to make new all time highs regularly, you definitely don't want to be too heavy on a single play like LCTITAN - else, this can cause your portfolio to stay low for an extremely long time.

This quarter may not be the worst result / show the worst result - I have no idea when.  But as Buffet says, there is only 1 rule in investing which is - don't lose monies.  I blogged about this here.

Summary and Conclusion
LCTITAN's quarterly update result last week was more or less expected - the continued losses was not surprising, because we know it won't be easy to turn around. However, it's not as bad as it could be and is hinting on "better" signs.

Nevertheless, my personal view is there is more than 50% chance, that the next 3 quarters will continue to show losses.  Whether it is "better" or "worse", I'll leave it to the experts to comment.

Nevertheless, I am already positioned for the turnaround, with 2.04% capital.

This is a highly emotional stock - over the next few years, I won't be surprised if Mr Market turns from utter depression to highly speculative mania.

Good luck.

PS.  This is not my best turnaround play idea.

Saturday, May 4, 2024

TENAGA - Personal Reactions

Came across this old article - over 2 weeks old in fact.
As an independent investor, how should you read this?


 Here's my instant reactions.

  1. Interesting.  AI and Data Centre should boom longer term and requires more energy, but how much?
    • (that question requires more reading.  700MW this year, 5,000 MW by 2035 means what % compared to TENAGA's total sales and net profit after spending and investments?).
  2. yingxian@wsj.com.   Same name again.  Just noting the wsj (foreign) exposure.
And here's the funny reaction that caused me to laugh!  

Appreciate it's a summary, I probably shouldn't laugh, but if one makes an argument about its long term business prospects that stretched up to 2035 (11 years from now) then:
  1. Why such a low price target of RM12.80 (just RM1.40 or a bit more than 10% upside)?
  2. If this is a macro trend to long term profitability, why not supplement with a higher longer term target?
For example, since we are now talking till 2035 (macro), let's talk over a shorter period and use Technical Analysis.   
  1. See that uptrend line since 30 years ago?
  2. Imagine a channel parallel to this and connecting the peaks.
  3. Where do you think TENAGA is right now?  In the middle of that channel?
  4. Why not just paint a picture that TENAGA could get to the peak of that channel, somewhere over the next 3-7 years, hitting RM18-22 say?  Much higher target over much shorter period.
I think it's not impossible scenario over next 3-7 years.
  1. Over this period, markets are likely to crash and go into a strong bull market.
  2. This type of stock, barring political and other non-market interventions, is a great one.
  3. I agree with the Affin Hwang analyst that AI and Data Centres will consume greater electricity over time.  This is a macro trend coming from big data crunching and exponentially increasing related apps.  However it's also important to "contextualize" this, because there are so many other demands for electricity and there will be future efficiencies too.  
Summary and Conclusion

RM12.80 target is amusing.
  • If want to predict long term, then, I will say something like: Next 3-7 years target is around RM18-RM22!
On more serious note:
  • Lower price remains accumulation.
  • Exceeding the top of that channel is obviously a selling zone.
  • I will definitely sell earlier if I find better stocks to rotate into when price is high.
Don't take this prediction too seriously!
Stay amused, keep reading widely.
Good luck!

TENAGA - More Thoughts

I briefly blogged about my TENAGA holdings performance here.  Since then the price has continued to rise from 11.86 to 12.32.  Has the price risen too fast too soon?

Here's some additional considerations.

Profile

Key notes:  Largest electric utility company in Malaysia (pretty much a monopoly, with pricing power, in line with our everyday experience as Malaysians).

Long Term Price Charts

Key notes:
  1. That long term uptrend line has a fundamental reason behind this.  Doesn't mean it is a concrete support.  But even if it is breached one day in the future, give enough time for markets to calm down and it will rise back up to respect that long term uptrend line again, due to its fundamental profile.
  2. This is price returns, ignoring dividends.  But dividends are key to understand TENAGA.
Key Fundamental Statistics
Long term numbers generally don't lie (although care is needed in the start date selection).  
Key Notes:
  1. RPS CAGR is 2.47% over past 10 years but easy to forget that this is the number 1 electric utility in the country for a long time with the widest penetration.  Don't expect rapid rise in this parameter (except for when it increases prices from time to time) but don't expect this to drop either (ignoring temporary brief business contraction during crisis).   This broadly matches real inflation growth, something desirable a highly diversified portfolio if all else is equal.
  2. EPS CAGR.  The negative figure needs care in interpreting, and easy to dismiss the quality of management as poor, however, this business is of critical interest to Malaysia government (politicians), and so, is not immune to non-market (e.g. political) influences / intervention in the past (and future), like other developing countries.  It shouldn't be (in a free, independent market), but in Malaysia, this risk can never be fully eliminated, regardless of who is in power.
  3. DPS CAGR.  Whilst the developing mentality / political risk is always there, it doesn't necessarily mean that it is constant, and this is where timing matters.    Long term, the dividend growth of 5.68% per annum CAGR DPS growth is market friendly, and we can't complain too much.
  4. NAPS CAGR.  2.6% is decent for this type of company long term.
Foreign Shareholding Ownership %
TENAGA is generally transparent in its website on this topic.
Whilst there are the occasional gaps, I compiled the following and correlate it to its price chart (excluding dividends).  The correlation is quite clear.


Some takeaways:
  1. TENAGA foreign shareholding is around 12%-13% at end Feb 2024.  My guess is it may have risen last Friday.
  2. Historically, when foreign shareholding % drops, TENAGA price drops.  The correlation is very clear.
  3. A few months ago (see RHS of chart), there has been some divergence.  This indicator is likely lagging.
  4. In 2017-2018 peak, the foreign shareholding % doubled today's level.  The only question mark is will foreigners, after such a long absence, comes back to Malaysia like the old days, or is there something permanently lost in foreigner's eyes on Malaysia after 2020?  This could be both climate related (global climate risks, greening, the global need to act urgently before climate catastrophe) and political (the prosecution of 1MDB?).  Note the flat blue-line after 2020.  Otherwise, it's a no-brainer - buy TENAGA and hold and wait for foreigners to come back.  TENAGA cannot completely eliminate coal overnight, however, for TENAGA to change its business profile is a process that takes time.  Similar, lost trust takes longer to rebuild.  
The importance of Dividends, buy when cheap and do nothing most of the time
A slightly busier chart - 3 lines.  Closing Price vs Adjusted Close.  The difference between the 2 is that the Adjusted Close includes dividends.

Key Notes:
  1. Excluding dividends, TENAGA hasn't made a new price high yet.
  2. Including dividends, TENAGA has already made a new high.
  3. The CAGR are as follows:
Note the dividend gap yield translates to 5.1% (2.9%--2.2%) per annum CAGR difference.   This is a sizeable yearly difference, and points to the edge investors have when they do nothing most of the time and just hold the company.

To avoid the negative 2.2%, it simply means TENAGA is a stock that you want to wait for a low price to enter. It doesn't have to be at the very low, but as long as it is below average / below 3rd quartile, it should be seriously considered for addition.

It also means at extremes, you must sell TENAGA.  Especially when the aim is 9% per annum total returns over the long term.   However, we do note that +2.9% per annum CAGR should match FD over the longer term.

Concluding Remarks
For long term investors aiming for at least 9% per annum returns in a highly diversified long term divided stock portfolio:
  1. TENAGA is a stock that you want to own when its price has fallen.   
    • Over the past 3 decades, there are probably 8-10 opportunities when there is significant crash, to buy and hold.  
    • During this period, the dividend yield can expect to return 4.5% to 6% per annum returns and price returns does the rest.
  2. TENAGA is not a trading stock.   
    • Because there's only 8-10 opportunities over the past 3 decades, the odds of getting out too early is high, meaning the odds of not being able to get back in after getting out at attractive price is also quite high.
    • Better to stay invested in this type of stock.
  3. TENAGA is a stock where once you own, you want to do nothing most of the time, until you see extremes in market over-valuation.
    • Last Friday's price action to spike up from 12 to 12.32 is not over-valuation extremes.  Long term investors should ignore.
  4. TENAGA dividends - when price is low - is attractive.
    • Additionally, it's long term historical DPS growth has been good, and my personal belief is that the long term future dividend growth is also decent (maybe a bit lower than the past).
    • Additionally if electricity prices were to spike in the future (which can lead to high general inflation due to its prevalence, e.g. arising from high energy prices), you definitely want to own this stock before these stressed times occur. 
  5. Over long term, this stock provides a natural real inflation hedge to retailers, institutions, pretty much everybody in Malaysia.
    • Common sense really, and is indeed our everyday experience.
  6. Price action and long term dividend yield dominates investing decision.   
    • Quarterly reports is just monitoring after the fact, to see, keep abreast, but not critical to anticipating the future (which noone can do reliably all the time) and not critical for the portfolio to deliver the long term 9% per annum returns.






Friday, May 3, 2024

HEKTAR

Introduction

HEKTAR is a REIT - retail focused, not the best, but not bad.
First bought 26 Jan 24 at 65 sen, averaged down at 62 and 61.5 sen, and then, bought more on the way up at 63, 63.5 and 64 sen.  Average cost ~ 63 sen.  At 71 sen today, the price return alone is wonderful, considering I only owned it for only 3+ months.   When I first entered, the after tax dividend yield for retailers iirc was 7%+.

 


Long Term Chart since 2007

RHS since COVID low is not a bearish price action.
  • Higher lows, breakouts for 2 downtrend lines, approaching horizontal resistance.
  • > 50% chance to break out above the horizontal resistance of 73 sen.  Bias not on the downside.
  • Consolidation likely, my wild guess:
    • < 20% chance to make lower low
    • 40% chance consolidation price action, and 
    • 40% chance to breakout above 73 sen before end this year.
High Dividend Yield
TTM DPS ~ 5 sen.  Taxable, so, net of tax is 4.5 sen.
Equal to 6.3% dividend yield.  Still beats EPF if it can retain 5 sen gross DPS going forward.
It was even more attractive when I first entered 3 months ago and averaged down and up.

Historical DPS
Annual report has this nice chart since 2007.
Recall 2009 was GFC and the DPS was solid as a rock.
But COVID in 2020 killed the DPS.
Fast recovery in 2022, but not sustainable and surprisingly, 2023 DPS dropped to only 5 sen.
Looks normal.  Typically "double low" (low in 2020, low again in 2023) to mark bottom, if you are a technician who sees double bottom everywhere (could be confirmatory bias!).
But this kind of dividend action gets a C in recent time - it's not exactly growing every year, but up and down i.e. just average.

More Fundamental statistics

These kind of numbers get a C- from me.  

So, why did I buy 3 months ago?
If dividends get a C- and fundamentals get a C, why did I enter in Jan 2024?
Actually, lucky.
3 months ago, I felt my cash holdings was a bit too big and wanted to do something about that.  
I had already added the good stocks, and didn't want to be overconcentrated.  
I've been monitoring and stalking HEKTAR for quite a long time.
Dividend yield after tax of 7% finally attracted me.
I felt price may be close to accumulation zone, plus  2023 DPS may be close to bottom.  
Figured it wouldn't hurt to get something at an initial entry at 65 sen.  
Then, when price dipped, looking at those malls, I figured nothing much has changed since I first entered at 65 sen and since my position size is small, it made sense to add at lower prices, so, I kept adding.  

And as luck would have it, today, closed 71 sen.
Position size wise, it's around 2.4% of my portfolio i.e. feels about right for an average REIT.   It's not exactly a great REIT to own in a big way.

What's my forward looking view now?

The REIT recently raised cash for a reason, which felt neutral to me.   
3 months should not have changed the fundamentals that much.
My subconscious was thinking along these line, later, I saw this IB analysis, which echoed my subconscious reasoning.

Take a look at US Fed Funds rate since 1970s.
  • Note they never stay flat.
  • After peaking, historically, odds are good that rates will eventually fall.
  • This fall tend to be sustained and there are certain asset classes that you want to own when this happens.
IIRC, the Feds themselves is saying it's quite possible to cut rates 3 times.
  • The typical prediction is around 75-100 bps.
  • When US rates fall, Malaysia and other countries rates are more likely to follow suit (only the quantum and timing is uncertain)
  • The timing is especially hard to predict.  It could be delayed, but when the REIT pays 7% per annum, the beauty is we can afford to wait.


If rates fall, which assets would you like to own?

To me, 3 types of assets:

1. Long term bonds.   Lower yields raises the market value of those bonds.  But not too long a term because yield curve drops are rarely parallel drops.
2. Dividend stocks.   Lower yield increase the present value of these future dividends, triggering re-rating..
3. REITS.  As explained by the IB above.  Basically, lower yields will make REITS relatively more attractive (because lower yields is typically good for business profits, their rental and occupancies should rise, increasing their income, lowering their financing costs, increasing distributable profits, all good stuff for REITS).  When REITS gets more attractive, buyers chase them to cause a further rise in price.  Historically, this REIT trades at RM1.80 many years ago.

With this type of thinking, suddenly, the marginal REIT like HEKTAR becomes potentially interesting.

Would I chase to get a full position of 3% capital at 71 sen?

Honestly,  I'm not chasing because I already got 2.4% capital.  Also, total REIT is currently around a quarter of my portfolio, spread across 10 REITs or so, so, I feel I have enough REITS not to chase, but wait for better prices.
Looking at the daily chart, today's spike is quite large.  There is the 73 sen resistance.  I feel decent odds to hit 73 sen and then fall back down to 68 sen, and ding-dong for a while because next US rate decision is likely to be in June i.e. still a few more weeks to go.  Until then, I feel odds are prices might not go anywhere, but I could be wrong.

Why HEKTAR, why not other better high quality REITs?
Investing is not one-dimensional.
If investing in REIT is all about quality alone then, everyone would have superior returns.
You need to consider other aspects too.

For example, during accumulation stage, do you want prices to be higher or lower?  Ironically, you have to have the stomach to do the opposite - when you accumulate, you want to see paper losses for good/decent quality businesses!  

Look at the above price action comparing HEKTAR with IGBREIT, KLCC, PAVREIT and we throw in SUNREIT for good measure.  No question all these 4 REITS are quality REITS.  I also own KLCC and PAVREIT for diversification.

But of the 5 REITS above, over that time-frame, there is only 1 REIT you want to own to get the biggest bang for the buck.   The annualized returns for me, when I averaged down when HEKTAR gave that opportunity after my first entry at 65 sen, exceeded 100% per annum.    Remember this kind of price action when it gives you lower price to accumulate and then, after you are more or less filled, then, it rises up fast.  The 2nd best REIT out of the 5 above, assuming you average down, is SUNREIT because of that dipping price action, to allow you to buy more at lower prices and then, enjoy that rise with a full position.

But honestly, I was just lucky.  I followed my simple investing rule which is based on high dividend yield. I followed my position sizing rule.  I acted mechanically without much thought or hesitation.  Honestly didn't spend that much time thinking about the trade since Jan 2024.   I spent more time writing this article on HEKTAR, than I analyzed HEKTAR since I entered this stock in Jan 2024.

Summary and Conclusion

Short term gains should mean nothing to us when our investing time-frame is long term, and if our future outlook is bullish for this REIT over the longer term.  US Fed Rates will take several years to fall once it starts falling, the uncertainty is only when will it start to fall - it could be soon, or it could be a year from now even if market is not expecting this to be the case - the truth is nobody knows.

Regardless of timing, hopefully, yields will evetually come down gradually for many years in the coming near term whislt avoid US stock markets from crashing and avoiding the rest of the world stock markets from crashing too.

All the best!

Thursday, May 2, 2024

MBM Resources

A Beautiful Price Chart that makes new all time highs! 


My average buy price (excluding dividends) = 3.50.
My average buy price (including dividends and realized gains) = 2.75.
Total dividends collected = 13% capital.  (keep collecting this and one day, my cost will be free and one day when markets crashed, I will rinse and repeat).
One of my larger wins in a highly diversified dividend stock portfolio.

TTM dividends = 39 sen, when EPS was record level at 86 sen.

Dividend yield = 7.9% and still looks like it's growing (39 sen / 4.96 = 7.9%)!

Beautiful Fundamentals!


Look at:

  • 10 year EPS growth (A)
  • 10 year DPS growth (A)
  • 10 year RPS growth (C+)
  • 10 year NAPS growth (C+)
This is a growth stock that shares its dividends with shareholders every single year.  Management (B).

What a lovely profile!

PS.

Not a fan of chasing.
If you don't own it, I can't advise you because I'm in a different situation.
I love to collect its dividends.
I'm playing the long game here with this kind of profile.
I may take a small profit at the next major resistance, but maybe not if we are still in a bull market.

Advantages of investing in Dividend Stocks

What do I mean by Dividend Stocks?

Definitely, I don't mean any stock that pays dividends or one time dividends.
Instead, I mean good quality stocks that pays regular increasing dividends over time.
Good quality meaning stocks of businesses that grows its EPS, DPS, NTA over time, run by able management and able to purchase at an attractive price.
By itself, this is very good to own already.
However, what are the other advantages of these Dividend (growth) Stocks?

Here are just 6+1 reasons why I love these type of stocks.

1. Regular Growing Income

My personal expectation is that one day, when I eventually retire, my dividend portfolio will replace my active income, to provide me with regular income, supported by sound growing businesses, that provides me also with a growing income over time.

Disclaimer:  This sounds good in theory, but is not an easy thing to do for most people.  Many reasons.  For many people I met, the main obstacle, besides investment knowledge, is capital.  The capital required to provide RM1,000 per month (a small amount) is typically 6 digit.  E.g. 4% dividend yield to deliver RM1k per month or RM12k per year requires RM300k capital.  Targetting RM10k per month requires RM3 million in capital today.  For many of the "bilis" investors, this 7 digit capital is outside their reach.  

2. Natural Inflation Hedge

One of retiree's greatest fear is inflation during retirement when there is no active income.  A period of high inflation can erode what was originally a decent monthly income.   Fixed Deposit investors in particular are at risk.   To get a sense, if inflation is a high 6% per annum, after 12 years, the value of that income has halved.

So, to illustrate, let say, you aimed for RM10k per month income at age 60.
You decide to invest in FD to earn 3% per annum returns. (this by the way requires RM4 million capital).
And let's say real inflation (not headline inflation) is 6% per annum in the future.
So, how much goods and services can your RM10k income at age 60 buy, by the time you hit 72 years old?

Answer is half.   Your 10k nominal can only buy RM5k in real goods and services, i.e. your income has halved!  Suddenly, your RM10k can only buy half the goods and services!   But you are 72 years old already and no longer able to earn an active income!  What can you do?  Not much actually.

And this is sure to happen again!  Next 12 years, you turned 84 years old.  Your original RM10k at age 60 can now only buy RM2.5k worth of goods and services i.e. you are literally very poor now.

In other words, inflation is one of the FD retiree's greatest fear.  The other is outliving their capital.

Whereas what happens if you own a highly diversified portfolio of dividend growth stocks?   You can reasonably expect that the above average, quality businesses that you owned will have revenues, profits and dividends are at least aligned with inflation.   Your original RM10k monthly income at age 60, can still buy the same RM10k worth of goods and services by the time you hit 72 and 84 years old, notwitstanding 6% per annum real inflation.

So, clearly, FD can't do this.  Incidentally, many life insurance policies that pays a yearly survival payment to you, also can't do this, if their yearly payments is a constant amount.  What looks large today, will shrink by the time those payments are due 20, 30, 40 years down the track.

3. Lower Price Volatility

Older investors desire lower price volatility to their stock portfolio.

By and large, dividend stocks tend to have lower volatility.  

But nothing is guaranteed.  

To me, this is just "nice to have" but not essential.  

This is because Mr Market ultimately controls prices.  "Hoping" for lower volatility doesn't help with our mental health.   Better to just ignore the price and focus on the underlying business - the EPS, the DPS, the NTA, growth and when it suits you, the price charts.  

Successful investing doesn't have to be more complex than this.

4. Signs of good management

A growing profitable stock that does not share its profits with shareholders is too much risk for me. 

Sure, sometimes, the price gains are good.  But, other times, the market just refuses to recognize the value and one can wait for decades with no real returns.   

Whereas a stock that has a CAGR growth in DPS over 10 years will keep rewarding me regularly.   I don't have to do anything.  It unlocks its value naturally and every dividend payment is welcomed.

As the business grows, it shares its profits proportionately.   

All these is essential to me in Malaysia.  This is because KLSE is not like US markets.  All stock theory tend to originate in the US where market liquidity is very good and where US shareholder actions are common place.  

However, here in back-water Malaysia, management and big shareholders can and has gotten away with a lot more than what they could in the US.   

Hence, one huge advantage for me to own a growing stock that pays dividends is that I can be reasonably assured that the future profits will be shared with me regularly over time.   Especially when we own a highly diversified dividend growth stocks (like more than 30 different stocks).   

5. Keeps management honest

Experienced investors and I note that sometimes, when management has too much cash and doesn't share that profits with shareholders, it can lead to management doing stupid things with that excess cash and causes shareholders to lose.  

A profitable company that pays regular dividends have lesser risks of that happening.

They can do stupid things still, but at least, you have received some of the cash already.

6. Your cash holdings naturally grow without having to sell anything.

If you don't need the yearly dividend income, the regular dividends received becomes a natural, easy way to build up cash over time, to take advantage of the next stock market crash.   

If the bull market lasts 5-10 years and your dividend yield is say 5% over this period, that's 25%-50% capital returned to you in the form of cash after end of 5-10 years.   That's not a small sum.   And if the market crashed after that, you naturally have 25%-50% cash to take advantage of the lower prices!

This to me is a HUGE advantage.

Contrast the nil dividend stocks.  The investor rides it up for 5-10 years and if he doesn't sell, probably  rides it down after the crash, and still not have the cash to take advantage of lower prices.   So, this speculator must sell to raise cash.  Selling is not so easy for nearly all investors.   Why?  Because it requires another critical decision from you.  You have to look at price charts, you have to ask yourself questions like am I selling too soon or too early, etc.  It causes you to monitor the markets too much and likely to cause you to feel regret.  In short, buying and selling tends to hook you into an emotional roller coaster that causes you to waste your time.

You bypass most of this by owning dividend growth stocks.

So, this to me is the beauty of dividend growth stocks.  You sit tight and your cash just keeps growing and growing and growing.  

7. Your account is biased to keep making New All Time Highs Regularly!

This is so under-estimated, until you actually proven this to yourself after many years.   If you own a diversified portfolio of good quality growing dividend stocks, you don't have to do much and your account just keep making new all time highs regularly.

Do you know why this happens?

It's because of this price phenomena after a stock goes ex-dividend and the price falls.  

If the business fundamentals remain intact, pretty soon, the price will tend to rise back to the former levels after paying you cash.  

This happens so many times. 

In bull markets, the price also makes new highs.

What a wonderful feeling, to keep seeing your accounts to keep making new all time highs reliably and regularly.

Summary and Conclusion

I have shared with you my 6+1 reasons why I love dividend growth stocks.

Come from another angle, particularly for those approaching 50 to 60 years old, as you get older, you want to retire comfortably.   Not everyone of us can be ultra rich so much so that we no longer need to invest because our principal is so large that we don't need to earn any interest at all.

And we keep getting older after 60.  70 will come, 80 will come, 90 will come, where our cognitive ability declines with age.  Essentially, you want someone else to work for you to generate income for you.

This is what a diversified portfolio of growing dividend stocks do for you.   If you own 30 different stocks, that's like asking 30 different CEO and their teams to work for you during your retirement.  Isn't that a lovely feeling?   

Wednesday, May 1, 2024

Has S&P500 peaked yet?

Why do we care? 

Historically, when US markets sneeze, we catch a cold.
Global stock markets are so interconnected these days.  US stock market remains the largest in the world, everyone still looks at it, including Malaysians.
The US stock market has been in a long term bull run since the low of the Global Financial Crisis (666.79 in Mar 2009), it's more than 15 years of bull run now, the question is when is the next one coming?
If Tech Crash and GFC repeats, we could be in for a reasonable winter lasting over 1-3 years potentially, if history is a guide, even if notoriously unpredictable.



What are the Predictors of US stock market crash?

Firstly, nobody can successfully predict a stock market crash consistently all the time.  There are some general principles, but translating that to accurate timing / peak levels is extremely difficult.  Some considerations:

1. Over-valuations.
The trouble with this is that market peaks at different P/E levels historically, so, there's no one single magic level.  Here's some ideas:

See the peaks? Since 2000, the peaks have gone much higher than prior peaks.  That's one difficulty.  Second difficulty is that peaks normally occur when EPS is depressed and at its lowest i.e. predictors of market bottom rather than peaks.  Somewhere in between is when markets - which looks ahead - peak first before the economic recession/difficulties comes in to depress earnings.  Not so easy.  
So, where's the US market right now?  

Looks to me, it's not near peak yet?  E.g. compare to Covid peak in Q4/20 when it hits 30.  Recall around this time, Malaysia and other countries have been in global lock-down for quite a while, economic activities hit hard, earnings at the lowest and not surprised that P/E peaked.  But prices have already came down hard, a bit too late isn't it?
EPS lowest in Q1/2020, when lockdown first started.  However, note today's EPS is so much higher than in 2019 before COVID.  So, US earnings is still resilient.  Note Fed funds peaked for over a year already.  The Feds are doing a good job so far, balancing interest rates with economic activity.  We now have the longest ever period of an inverse yield curve, and we still haven't seen earnings taking a significant dive.

2. Economic indicators?
Which one?
Can you act on it timely enough, or too late?
Where is the threshold level?
How do you interpret this?

Let's start with US GDP growth.  
FYE2023 looks normal at 2.5%.
But most recent April figure is 1.6%.
Where is the threshold level to be concerned and start selling? (I don't know).

Honestly, I can't really use it timely.  I can't use this to accurately predict historical market crashes in advance before everyone else.  By the time I see it, 99.99% of the time, I'm quite certain market prices have already moved.  In short, this is lagging for me.

The wierd thing is last time during 2009, there's that negative bar and the stock market after 2009 has only been wonderful.   In COVID 2000 negative bar, we've only see 3 positive bar so far, so, a valid question is why can't this market keep running over next few years?  I really don't know.


Let's try another one - US unemployment rates.
This chart is not telling me anything new.  All I see is the Covid spike i.e. when most countries are on lock down, unemployment went up to very high levels and today's level doesn't quite bat an eyelid.  Hard to get excited by recent figures isn't it?  What would you do?  Buy more or sell more?  I don't know.

Let's try another one - US inflation.

Past 10 years.  The right bar doesn't look like it's at an extreme level?  How do you interpret this?  When inflation peaked, markets didn't crash.  When it bottomed in 2020, that we already know due to Covid and high unemployment, low GDP activity i.e. hard for inflation to happen when there's so little monies circulating around notwitstanding lower economic activity.  A lot of these type of analysis sounds sophisticated, but how to use it to make money?  I don't know how.  (Hence, I usually end up ignoring a lot of these indicators, because it never helped me to make money).

3. Inverse yield curve
Historically, this one is perhaps one of the more reliable indicators in the sense that when it happened and when it is prolonged, it appears to foretell stock market crash.
Why?  Well, look at it.  Inverse means short term yields are higher than long term yields, the opposite of what normally happens.  In normal times, market requires higher yields at longer duration, to be rewarded sufficiently for higher uncertainty.   So, when it's inverted, it means market demands higher interest rate over the near term because it's expecting even greater uncertainty short term and needs to be rewarded for the higher uncertainty short term.  What is uncertain short term?  Lower economic activity short term?  Stock market crash?
Certainly, higher short term interest rates doesn't help businesses.  They have to pay higher interest costs, depressing their profits.  This can trigger recession if prolonged.
Certainly, banks will find it difficult to raise funds.   They have to borrow long (lower yields) to lend short (higher rates) which increases their risks.  This can depress their stock prices when banks takes higher long term risks. 
So, you have this situation that is precarious - nobody likes it.
So, you might be thinking -  the longer this happens, the higher the chance of recession?
And the market has been on the longest every inverse yield curve today since 1980s.
But when everyone expects it, will market crash?
Are they "just waiting" for the herd to run out of the gates?
It's too obvious, yet, there seems to be some fundamentals behind this.
Can markets defy fundamentals forever?
Markets always eventually crash.  The only questions are when and how big?
This one plus all others does signal caution.  For retirees especially without an active income and relies on savings, you cannot afford to be aggressive now.  
But there's no law that says that this inversion cannot last for a few more years, or last for another month.  Anything can still happen.


4. The Feds - Interest Rate and Monetary Policy
I recalled reading that the official Fed position is that they expect 3 rate cuts this year, but so far, nothing yet.  Why rate cut?  Well, they need to do something with the huge debt in the US balance sheet.  The world holds their bonds, they can't keep paying high rates externally.  The only fear is spurring further economic activity.  An economy that is too strong also has problems.  So, market takes a dip in anticipation of the upcoming Fed meeting, but as usual, the uncertainty spikes up before Fed meetings and then normalize.  Longer term, it's 50/50.  If rates are cut, the bears will say that this is proof that Fed sees recession coming and so need to spike up the economic activity via lower interest rates.  Bulls will say this is proof that the Fed acts in advance and will continue to manage the economy well i.e. the crash is pushed back further and further into the future.  It's all interpretations and herd behaviour i.e. I really don't know how to use this to predict future market movement.

Chart wise, yes it dips after hitting that strong Fibonacci resistance, but that's expected.  But will it predict a crash coming next?  I don't know.  But I have a plan if it comes and a plan if it doesn't come.

5. Geopolitical risks?
Recently, the Israel-Iran drone attacks seem to cause some worries of escallation that might speak contagion.  The Israel Hamaz Gaza related conflicts.  etc.
But taking a contrarian position, aren't these conflicts happening all the time?
Also, remember 911?  When markets crashed, aren't those the best time to buy and then sell when the conflict is no longer a conflict?
To me, that's a noise.

So, what characterize a market crash?
For me, it has to be price levels.  Price Charts.  A significantly lower prices over a prolonged period.
And that must be an opportunity.

How to capitalize a market crash?
This is when good quality businesses run by able management is sold at an attractive price.  As Buffet says, this is the time when he feels he is the only guy in a harem full of beautiful women.  He doesn't know which one to choose.  Everything feels attractive.

Nevertheless, not all businesses are the same.  Some gets hit harder and that's when they become more attractive if they have stronger recovery power.  During crash, dividend yields rise but what you are after is the subsequent price gains.  Your mindset need to shift a little.

The market values of your existing stock holdings will reduce.  However, you are diversified and you own good quality businesses.   So, the fall is normal and no need to panic.  Their dividend yields will rise and comfort yourself that your income is still there, maybe dropped a bit but future price gains is even more attractive.

As market values of stocks reduce, they will become a smaller proportion of your Net Worth, as your EPF, your FD, your property values are fixed and immune to the fall.   If they are previously 33% and market values fall 10%, they reduce to 30%.

In the first 6-12 months after seeing the peak in the market, typically around this time, this is when you start to consider buying the bargains, to raise it back to 33% i.e. rebalancing.  A lot of people will start shouting cheap, but ignore them.  It means real fear hasn't happened yet.

However, near the bottom (typically longer than 12 months of depressed prices), it's time to increase that 33% to a higher %.  By this stage the voice that shouts bargains have dropped.  That's when real fear comes in.

Volatility will be extremely high - typically highest.  VIX will typically spike up.  That's the time to start adding the 33% to be a higher number like 40%. 
 
Volatility is so high, typically, you will miss the timing because it's so damn volatile.  

There is no guarantee of recovery, but eventually recovery will happen in years to come.  It's not tomorrow, it's not next week, next month or even next year.  To get the biggest bang for the buck, we are talking several years.

Meanwhile the advantage of buying high dividend yield stocks is that the dividend income can sustain you and likely to be more than what you'll need.  The lows will give you a chance to own many more shares.

And many years later, the price gains will come if you have holding power and can hold for many years after.  Good quality businesses will recover, when market normalize later, even if very hard to see then.  This is when you will probably look at increasing your dividend income by another 5% --> 15% --> 25% ---> 50% -->100% depending on how bad the crash is and how well you play this crash.  This is also when you will have days and nights when you cannot sleep due to the massive volatility.  This is when you feel suddenly very rich after recovery, only to experience very huge falls causing you to feel regret, and when you least expect, the recovery makes you feel very rich again.   All this if you keep watching the stock prices too closely.   The fabled "emotional roller-coaster".  Not helpful.

Instead, as dividend investors, anchor ourselves in the dividend income.  Keep adding that dividend income.  Only after you are sure you've seen bottom, shift some of the dividend income into price gains.  The price gains will be spectacular.   Keep a lookout at warrant prices but unlikely you will be able to take advantage of that as typically, the issuers are also on the same lookout and looking to make a killing too.

All these are just speculations.  Some based on prior experiences of several market crashes but every crash is different.  It never turns out the way you expect it.  I was too young to remember the Oct 1987 stock market crash but old enough to read it in the newspapers and see its effects.  I remembered the Tech Crash and was lucky enough to participate in the recovery but my portfolio was far too small to make a difference to my life.   Every crash after that was different.  The last one was Covid where I missed the opportunity due to life and work issues, so, just because you know doesn't mean you are able to catch it.  

Being ready for it mentally and having the financial resources ready for a crash is not easy.  Group think rarely helps.  Critical to think and act independently and quietly.

It's easy to write this when markets are near all time high in the US.

Will Malaysia stock market crash when US crashes?
Even though the opening statements said that when US sneeze, we catch a cold, that statement is not entirely factual nor always true.  There are periods of convergence and divergence.


In short, nobody knows in advance, everyone knows in arrears.

Summary and Conclusion
Has S&P500 peaked yet?
Short answer is not sure - maybe it's at its last quarter of its long bull run of many years since GFC, but hard to say more precisely than that.  The inverted yield curve can't last forever, and everyone is looking out closely too, so, maybe it can last longer this time?

Will a US market crash cause KLSE to crash?  
Short answer is that whilst there is more convergence than divergence, historical data suggests that because the US market is so large, it typically has an impact across the world including Malaysia, although the extent may not be that large in Malaysia (e.g. Tech Crash was bad in the US, not so bad in Malaysia).  But it's not full-proof and I won't be surprised with either outcome.

We can't avoid significant falls in market values if US S&P500 crashes.  KLSE will follow, maybe lesser extent.  Your diversified dividend stocks should also fall, maybe lesser extent.  Diversification does not immunize your portfolio because > 50% of the price driver comes from market falls.  Expect FD rates to rise and expect EPF returns to fall if EPF didn't manage well.

Your EPF and FD proportion will rise as a % of your Net Worth, as your stock % falls.  During bull markets, it's the reverse.  So, when the reverse happens, this is the time for very careful monitoring and execution of averaging down and increasing the % in stocks.  Nothing extreme, because you still have to live but despite the huge volatility (VIX all time highs perhaps) and extreme fears and extreme aversion to stocks, when people stops calling buy the dips or buy the fears, that's when you should be looking out.  The first few calls to buy the dips should likely be ignored.

Anchor on the dividend income.  Those will likely dip a little too, so, look to add to keep it stable initially when it's significantly cheaper.  No absolute criteria. Everything is relative and dynamic at the time.  Experience and sense matters.  Seek calmness and quiteness when everyone around you are panicking.  No blind averaging down, you will easily spend too much cash buying.  You won't catch the bottom in any significant manner.  It is okay to leave the buys on the way up.  Cash is King during this period.   Bear markets don't last very long, maybe 3 years at the most.  Vast majority of people runs out of cash, and vast majority of people will be too afraid to utilize the little cash they have left. 

Most of your dividend stocks are intended for rising dividend income over the long term (> 10 years). Anchor on the business and the future dividend income.  Price gains may be the largest but ultimately, they are still bonus.  You actually don't need to do anything.  Hence, any price gains actions are bonuses.

Be prepared, good luck when it comes one day (if you can still remember this article)!

Buffet's Rule No 1 and 2 - Never lose Money

 These are probably the 2 most important rules of investing.

"The first rule of an investment is don't lose [money]. And the second rule of an investment is don’t forget the first rule. And that's all the rules there are."


But why?  Why are these the only 2 rules of investing?

Personally, to me, there's a few reasons - beyond stating the obvious that nobody wants to lose monies in investing.

Reason #1 - The retiree with a large EPF without active income.

For this segment of investor, if they are not ultra wealthy (i.e. they still need investment income to cover their lost salaries due to retirement), then, they will be in a permanently precarious position when lose monies because they then have to dip into their capital to spend to live, i.e.

1. There will be a permanent reduction to investing capital, and

2. To provide the same level of investment income as before, they need to target an even higher % returns that comes with higher risks of losing money.

Hence, for these investors, Buffet's Rule No 1 is critical.

Reason #2 - Returns Asymmetry:  If you lose 50% capital, a gain of +50% capital won't get you back to original capital.

This is an often forgotten concept, but mathematically, if you start with RM1 million and you lose 50%, the remaining principal is only RM500,000.

Then, if you want to grow RM500,000 back to RM 1 million, then, +50% return is insufficient.  This is because 500,000 x (1 + 50%) = 750,000 only.  

To get back to RM1,000,000, you need +100% returns.

This is the main reason why you should not dig a big hole, when it comes to wealth accumulation.

A small loss like -5% requires +5.26% returns to get back to 100% since (1-5%) x (1+ 5.26%) ~ 100%.

However, a big loss like -50% requires +100% returns to get back to original capital, since (1-50%) x (1+100%) = 100%.

This is simple mathematics - you must fully integrate this understanding into your subconscious.

Reason #3 - you have many other investment alternatives that doesn't lose monies

3 examples:

1. Put the money into savings account with a solid bank insured by PIDM and earn low interest.  Ask your parents, your grandparents, ask your relatives, ask your friends, ask how many of them lose monies  because they put monies in their savings account, and odds are, you will struggle to find one that has actually lost monies.  

2.  Put the money into fixed deposit with a solid bank insured by PIDM.  Again, ask the same people and ask how many of them lost monies vs investing in stocks and odds are, you will find nobody has lost monies yet when they put monies into FD.  They may lose out in some years to inflation, but they haven't lost monies like they lose in the stock market.

3. Put the money into EPF before age 55 and by the time you turn 55, you can always withdraw like a bank account (perhaps delay a few days for processing but no major drama if plan ahead).   Ask 100 people with real life EPF account and ask how many of them have lost monies.  Ask 55 and 60 year olds today how many have lost monies.  Ask 70 and 80 year olds today if they have lost monies.  Odds are, you won't find anyone.   Sure, there are always the doomday sayer who says EPF is a ponzi scheme and so on, but Malaysia EPF is not that extreme.  If you are approaching retirement today, EPF is still your safest and best investing vehicle for literally doing nothing.  On the other hand, if you are a fresh graduate entering the workforce, it doesn't harm you to diversify i.e. contribute to EPF and spare some monies for other ways of investing, such as savings in FD to plan to buy your own home that appreciates in value, assuming you own a basic car that will get you from A to B at reasonable cost.

Other examples is buying your own home to live in.  

Or invests in real estate property (a 2nd home, or more) but don't over leverage.  The value of a property appears stable due to lack of revaluation but it doesn't mean it cannot go down in the short term, although wait long enough (and assuming you don't over-pay like buy at the peak of the market, don't over-leverage like borrowing too much, unable to service interest and principal causing forced sell, don't make poor decisions like buying at a poor location), eventually, they will go back up (the uncertainty is timing).  Ask 100 people who actually bought prudently and held for a long term (at least 10 years) and the vast majority if not all wins (provided they don't over-pay, don't over-leverage and don't make poor buying decisions).   

Or invest in a diversified portfolio of a sound, growing, profitable businesses managed by above average management that can be purchased at an attractive price, that pays a stable % of earnings in dividends, combined with EPF + FD to take advantage of the rare stock market crashes. (this is harder to do than it sounds, but easier to do than it looks).

So, you really have so many alternatives that don't lose monies, hence, why should you lose monies in equities?

Reason #4 - if your equity investment goes to zero, you can never recover back.

This applies to the popular warrants / derivatives in KL stock market, and sometimes to the seriously speculative stocks.  

The thing is these warrants usually cause the vast majority of speculators to lose monies.  The number of speculators who eventually leave the warrant market far outnumber the extremely few speculators who are still punting and claimed to make money since Day 1 (likely, vast majority here are faking).  

Sure the gains can be occasionally be spectacular but do this long enough, and ask 100 players and vast  majority lose monies.  And in too many cases, these warrants goes to zero at expiry date.

The problem is greed + hope combined with leverage.  These are lethal combinations that is sure to cause you to lose monies in the long run.

Another famous Buffet quote:

Having a large amount of leverage is like driving a car with a dagger on the steering wheel pointed at your heart. If you do that, you will be a better driver. There will be fewer accidents but when they happen, they will be fatal.

Another Buffet and Munger concept:

Reason #5 - 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x ..... x 0 = 0

What this means is that no matter how many times you doubled your money in the past, all it takes is 1 time of -100% and your entire capital is lost permanently, forever with no chance of getting back into the game.

Reason #6 - you PERMANENTLY lose time to recoup losses and make gains

When you are young, time may not seem important to you, especially when you think you have lots of it.  But as you get older, you will learn that Time = Money.   

Those sensitive to time and safe returns know that it takes a long time to double your wealth via FD returns.  E.g. if FD earns 3% per annum, it takes 23-24 years to double your monies, so, if you lost 50% of your capital due to poor investment in speculative stock / warrants and avoid equity market altogether, it will take you 23-24 years to recoup that loss back, because you will have realized that losing 50% requires +100% returns (or doubling your monies) to recoup back your original investment.

That's an awful long time that has been permanently lost!

Other Rationalizations

Two popular rationalizations.

#1 Tuition Fees.

Sometimes - especially investment "educators" like to quote this - you never actually lose monies because you are paying "tuition fees" to the market.

On one hand, it's a positive thing to look at your losses and there's mental and emotional benefits for thinking like this.  It retains your sanity.

However, it is still a permanent loss.  The point is - in investing, there is really only ONE score-card.  Your P&L.  Everything else is excuses.  If you don't grow your monies in the equity market after a reasonable period of time, it means you are not suited for investing or trading and you are better off giving your monies to the professionals to manage than DIY yourself.

Your so called "tuition fees" are far too expensively paid.  I paid less than RM50-RM100 per lesson on my kid's tuition, you should not need to pay 10 times more for your investing "lessons", no matter how much these "educators" promised you will earn in return after "learning".  Sadly, there are some investors who has lost 5 digits, 6 digits or even more in the market and then had to leave the market permanently with that kind of losses with no chance of recouping.  That kind of lesson, when compared to studying Finance and Investments in Universities, are far too expensive and far less useful.  At least, with a degree in Finance or Investments, you can still look for employment and a salaried employment income!  With those ridiculous fees paid to "educators" for 3 or 5 or 7 day courses, which promises "financial freedom", which reputable financial institution would want to hire you and pay you a monthly salary after you "graduate"? 

#2 At least I beat the market

Another famous rationalization is - "at least I don't lose as much as the market" or "I beat the market".  Yes, market lost 20% and you lost 18%, so, you beat the market by 2%.  Wonderful!  But is it really?  

Again, you started with RM1 million, and now, you lost 18% and your capital shrunk to RM820,000.  You beat the market by 2%.  Are you happy?

For me, the answer has to be a resounding No!  No, I am not happy!  Unless this is a temporary loss, with a very high probability that I will eventually beat EPF / market (whichever is higher) by the same margin!  In other words, generalized excuses doesn't cut it for me.   

There needs to be a very high probability strategy, that will put me ahead by at least the same % win if not more.  If I take -20% risk, I want a return with very high probability (at least 75% probability) of eventually gaining +20% returns or more.   At least 3 to 1 win to lose odds, if not 5 to 1 or 10 to 1 odds, or better!   75% probability is the absolute minimum.   I prefer 95% chance of gaining 20% if lose 20%.

Long term successful business people don't gamble with 50-50 chance.  The really good ones already win when they enter the game.  To them, their combined business ventures and combined business deals are not gambles but certain wins, even if individual deal may risk losing monies.   That's how you should approach investing.   Don't invest, unless you are certain that you will come out a winner in the final account after a reasonable period of time.

If you can't visualize with certainty how you will come out winning, don't invest.  Instead, park your monies in EPF and at least, this way, you can visualize with 100% certainty that 1, 2, 3, 5, 10 years from now, your EPF balance will be higher.

This is not saying that every stock you invest in will be a winner.  The goal is the final account balance that combines all the stocks that you invest/traded in.  It is the final account that matters.  Whether a minority stock wins (with majority losing) but the total grows the account in a huge way, over time, is far more important than the component performance of that account.


LCTITAN - Quarterly Update

My previous article here .  Last week, LCTITAN announced its quarterly result.  We saw 8 consecutive quarters of losses totalling 108 sen.  ...